Ronald E. Blake v. 155 East 79th Street, LLC and T.G. Nickel & Associates, LLC

Ronald E. Blake v. 155 East 79th Street, LLC and T.G. Nickel & Associates, LLC

Case Name

Ronald E. Blake v. 155 East 79th Street, LLC and T.G. Nickel & Associates, LLC

Type of Injury

CONCUSSION AND NECK INJURIES

Occupation

Carpenter

Location

Kings County, New York

Verdict

The parties negotiated a pretrial settlement. T.G. Nickel & Associates’ insurer, which was contractually obligated to indemnify 155 East 79th Street LLC, agreed to pay $340,000. The negotiations were mediated by Robert Adams, of National Arbitration and Mediation Inc.

Verdict Amount

$340,000

Case Details

On July 9, 2014, plaintiff Ronald Blake, 61, a carpenter, worked at a construction site that was located at 155 E. 79th St., in Manhattan. During the course of his work, Blake was struck by plywood and lumber that had fallen from an overhead location. Blake claimed that he sustained injuries of his face, his head, his neck and a shoulder.

Blake sued the premises’ owner, 155 East 79th Street LLC, and the construction project’s general contractor, T.G. Nickel & Associates, LLC. Blake alleged that the defendants violated the New York State Labor Law.

Blake claimed that the plywood and lumber were components of a temporary frame that had been securing a freshly poured concrete floor. He claimed that the material was dislodged by a worker utilizing a crowbar. Blake’s counsel contended that Blake should not have been permitted to work beneath an area in which the frame was being dismantled. He contended that the incident stemmed from an elevation-related hazard, as defined by Labor Law § 240(1), and that Blake was not provided the proper, safe equipment that is a requirement of the statute.

Defense counsel did not dispute liability.

Disclaimer: The information on this website and blog is for general informational purposes only and is not professional advice. We make no guarantees of accuracy or completeness. We disclaim all liability for errors, omissions, or reliance on this content. Always consult a qualified professional for specific guidance.

RECENT POSTS

Expert reviewing future medical needs in a catastrophic injury case
October 19, 2026
Learn how future care planning helps document medical needs, support damages, and clarify long-term care in catastrophic injury cases.
Attorney reviewing a plaintiff's future care report
October 5, 2026
Learn which reporting mistakes can weaken serious injury cases, from unsupported care needs to poor cost research, outdated records, and unclear expert opinions.
Attorney reviewing a serious injury case
September 21, 2026
Learn what attorneys should look for when choosing a future care expert, including credentials, clinical experience, report quality, and litigation readiness.
Injury case documents and medical records
September 7, 2026
Learn which actions can damage a personal injury case, from delayed treatment to poor documentation. Discover practical ways to protect evidence and support future damages.
Expert reviewing medical records
August 24, 2026
Learn how a medical needs assessment helps identify future care, daily living needs, and functional limits in serious injury cases. Discover what makes the process reliable.

CONTACT US