Nicholas Calvo v. United States Lines, Inc.

Nicholas Calvo v. United States Lines, Inc.

Case Name

Nicholas Calvo v. United States Lines, Inc.

Type of Injury

HERNIATED DISC

Occupation

securing and unsecuring cargo containers

Location

NY

Verdict

$1,483,000, reduced to $1,186,400 for 20% comparative negligence of Pltf.

Verdict Amount

$1,186,400.00

Case Details

VII/29-23 MARITIME ACCIDENT – LONGSHOREMAN – FALL ON GREASE – HERNIATED DISC

Nicholas Calvo v. United States Lines, Inc. 83 Civ 1061 Verdict 12/8/88 Judge Edward R. Korman, Eastern District

VERDICT: $1,483,000, reduced to $1,186,400 for 20% comparative negligence of Pltf. The gross award was reduced as excessive by the Court to $1,233,000 for a net verdict of $986,400. Subsequently settled for approximately $850,000.

Pltf. Atty: Jethro M. Eisenstein of Profeta & Eisenstein, Manhattan

Deft. Atty: Philip S. LaPenta of Gulmi, LaPenta, Campbell, Burns & Mahoney, Manhattan

Facts: Pltf., in his late 20s at the time of the accident, was working as a lasher aboard Deft.’s ship, the American Legend. His work entailed securing and unsecuring cargo containers. While on top of one of the ship’s hatches, he stepped in a large greasy area and fell 15 feet to the deck. He was taken by ambulance to the hospital. Testimony indicated that a co-worker had brought the greasy condition to the attention of the night mate, and that nothing was done about it. Deft. argued that Pltf. was comparatively negligent because the condition was open and obvious. Deft. also argued that Pltf. was an experienced longshoreman and should have noticed the condition. Injuries: herniated lumbar disc requiring a laminectomy and a fusion. The laminectomy was partially successful, and Pltf. still has nerve root impingement. Pltf. is functionally illiterate and reads only at a second grade level. He argued that his limited abilities preclude him from finding non-manual labor. Pltf. Experts: Edmond Provder, occupational rehabilitation expert; David Zaumier, economist, Lexington Economic Consultants. Deft. Expert: Raleigh Ralls, economist, Little Rock, Arkansas.

Disclaimer: The information on this website and blog is for general informational purposes only and is not professional advice. We make no guarantees of accuracy or completeness. We disclaim all liability for errors, omissions, or reliance on this content. Always consult a qualified professional for specific guidance.

RECENT POSTS

Expert reviewing future medical needs in a catastrophic injury case
October 19, 2026
Learn how future care planning helps document medical needs, support damages, and clarify long-term care in catastrophic injury cases.
Attorney reviewing a plaintiff's future care report
October 5, 2026
Learn which reporting mistakes can weaken serious injury cases, from unsupported care needs to poor cost research, outdated records, and unclear expert opinions.
Attorney reviewing a serious injury case
September 21, 2026
Learn what attorneys should look for when choosing a future care expert, including credentials, clinical experience, report quality, and litigation readiness.
Injury case documents and medical records
September 7, 2026
Learn which actions can damage a personal injury case, from delayed treatment to poor documentation. Discover practical ways to protect evidence and support future damages.
Expert reviewing medical records
August 24, 2026
Learn how a medical needs assessment helps identify future care, daily living needs, and functional limits in serious injury cases. Discover what makes the process reliable.

CONTACT US