Juana Rodriguez v. Rego II Borrower LLC East Bay Mechnical Corp and RPC General Contractors, Inc.

Juana Rodriguez v. Rego II Borrower LLC East Bay Mechnical Corp and RPC General Contractors, Inc.

Case Name

Juana Rodriguez v. Rego II Borrower LLC East Bay Mechnical Corp and RPC General Contractors, Inc.

Type of Injury

HERNIATED DISC AND ARM INJURIES

Occupation

Cook

Location

Queens, NY

Verdict

The jury found that East Bay Mechanical was liable for the accident. Prior to the scheduled start of the trial’s damages phase, the parties negotiated a settlement. East Bay Mechanical’s insurer agreed to pay $1,195,500.

Verdict Amount

$1,195,500

Case Details

On June 26, 2013, plaintiff Juana Rodriguez, 44, a cook, worked at a newly opened restaurant that was located at 6135 Junction Blvd., in the Rego Park section of Queens. While Rodriguez was exiting the restaurant’s walk-in refrigerator, she was struck by an A-frame ladder that had fallen from an upright position. Rodriguez claimed that she suffered injuries of an arm, her back, her head and a shoulder.

Rodriguez sued the premises’ owner, Rego II Borrower LLC; the general contractor that oversaw construction of the restaurant, RPC General Contractors Inc.; and a contractor that had serviced the restaurant’s air-conditioning system, East Bay Mechanical Corp. Rodriguez alleged that the defendants negligently created a dangerous condition that caused the accident.

Rego II Borrower and RPC General Contractors were dismissed. The matter proceeded to a trial against East Bay Mechanical.

Rodriguez claimed that the ladder had been folded and was leaning on a wall and concealed by the refrigerator’s door. Rodriguez’s counsel suggested that the ladder had been situated by an employee of East Bay Mechanical. He presented three of the restaurant’s employees, each of whom claimed that East Bay Mechanical employees had been working at the restaurant two days prior to the accident, that the workers had been using ladders similar to the one that struck Rodriguez, and that they had witnessed a ladder being used in the general vicinity of the area in which the accident occurred.

Defense counsel claimed that East Bay Mechanical did not own or use the ladder involved in the accident. East Bay Mechanical’s owner claimed that his company’s records suggest that the company’s workers had not visited the restaurant during the 22 weeks that preceded the accident, though he also claimed that any work performed in June 2013 would have been warranty work and therefore unbilled and undocumented. During cross-examination, he acknowledged that the company’s record-keeping was erratic and could have been inaccurate with regard to its last activity at the restaurant.

Disclaimer: The information on this website and blog is for general informational purposes only and is not professional advice. We make no guarantees of accuracy or completeness. We disclaim all liability for errors, omissions, or reliance on this content. Always consult a qualified professional for specific guidance.

RECENT POSTS

Vocational expert reviewing earning capacity records
November 2, 2026
Learn how vocational experts evaluate work history, medical limits, job options, and future income to measure a serious injury's financial impact.
Expert reviewing future medical needs in a catastrophic injury case
October 19, 2026
Learn how future care planning helps document medical needs, support damages, and clarify long-term care in catastrophic injury cases.
Attorney reviewing a plaintiff's future care report
October 5, 2026
Learn which reporting mistakes can weaken serious injury cases, from unsupported care needs to poor cost research, outdated records, and unclear expert opinions.
Attorney reviewing a serious injury case
September 21, 2026
Learn what attorneys should look for when choosing a future care expert, including credentials, clinical experience, report quality, and litigation readiness.
Injury case documents and medical records
September 7, 2026
Learn which actions can damage a personal injury case, from delayed treatment to poor documentation. Discover practical ways to protect evidence and support future damages.

CONTACT US