Steven Pamphile v. NYCHA

Steven Pamphile v. NYCHA

Case Name

Steven Pamphile v. NYCHA

Type of Injury

LEAD POISONING

Occupation

student

Location

Kings, NY

Verdict

Defense verdict (5/1)

Verdict Amount

$0.00

Case Details

XV/40-14 LEAD POISONING EXPOSURE AT APARTMENT COMPLEX DEFENSE VERDICT

Steven Pamphile v. NYCHA 46070/93 3-week trial Verdict 2/13/98 Kings Supreme

Judge: Vasilios J. Arniotes

Verdict: Defense verdict (5/1). Jury: all female.

Post-trial motions were denied.

Pltf. Atty: Jeffrey Pittel, of counsel to E. Tanenhaus, P.C., Manhattan

Deft. Atty: Alan Kaminsky of Wilson, Elser, Moskowitz, Edelman & Dicker, Manhattan

Facts: This action arose out of Pltf. s alleged exposure to lead at Deft. s apartment complex located on Ave. X in Brooklyn. Pltf. was an 8-year-old student at the time of the exposure beginning in June 1992. Pltf. moved from Haiti to Deft. s apartment complex in June 1992. He received a blood test as part of a school physical that showed a lead level of 43 mg/dl. The Department of Health inspected Deft. s apartment and found significant violations of unacceptable amounts of lead in the paint, and issued an order to abate the condition. Pltf. received chelation treatment for his lead poisoning. Subsequent apartment inspections by the Housing Authority and by Pltf. s own experts were inconclusive as to whether the level of lead in the paint was within allowable limits.

Injuries: brain damage; neurological injuries; diminished IQ; attention deficit disorder. Pltf. claimed that he is unable to perform tasks competently, and claimed that he has poor verbal abilities as a result of his exposure to lead. Deft. contended that Pltf. s lead poisoning occurred in Haiti. Deft. further argued that the lead level in the apartment was acceptable, and argued that the XRF machine used by the Department of Health was not calibrated properly, leading to inaccurate findings that resulted in the violation being issued.

Demonstrative evidence: enlargements of the XRF machine readings; school and hospital records. Jury deliberation: 3 hours. Specials: alleged lost earnings of $2,000,000.

Pltf. Experts: Dr. Robert Karp, pediatrician, Brooklyn; Dr. David Dorfman, neuropsychologist, Manhattan. Dr. William Berg, economist, Manhattan.

Deft. Experts: Dr. William Head, neurologist, Staten Island; Dr. Edmond Provder, vocational rehabilitation, Manhattan.

Disclaimer: The information on this website and blog is for general informational purposes only and is not professional advice. We make no guarantees of accuracy or completeness. We disclaim all liability for errors, omissions, or reliance on this content. Always consult a qualified professional for specific guidance.

RECENT POSTS

Importance of a Vocational Expert in TDIU Cases
June 2, 2025
Learn how oasinc vocational experts play a crucial role in TDIU cases and how their testimony can strengthen disability claims for veterans seeking benefits
When and Why to Call a Vocational Expert for Evaluations - Oasinc
May 19, 2025
Exploring what vocational evaluations are, how a vocational expert helps, and when is the right time to call oasinc vocation expert for evaluations. Learn More!
The Role of Vocational Experts in SSD Hearings - Oasinc
May 5, 2025
Learn how the role of a vocational experts enhances your SSD hearing and impact disability benefits. Learn how Oasinc Vocational Assessment Helpful in SSD Cases
What is the Role of the Vocational Expert? - OAS
April 21, 2025
What is the Role of the Vocational Expert? Explore what a Vocational Expert does, why they matter, and how Oasinc Vocational Expert services can help.
Why Are Vocational Experts Necessary in Personal Injury Cases?
April 7, 2025
Vocational Experts in Personal Injury Cases as they assess how an injury affects a person's ability to work and determine the impact on earning capacity.

CONTACT US