Robert Ryan v. Cedar Grove Cemetery Association; and Gasoline Installations, Inc. v. Malbro, Inc.

Robert Ryan v. Cedar Grove Cemetery Association; and Gasoline Installations, Inc. v. Malbro, Inc.

Case Name

Robert Ryan v. Cedar Grove Cemetery Association; and Gasoline Installations, Inc. v. Malbro, Inc.

Type of Injury

MULTIPLE FRACTURES

Occupation

laborer

Location

Queens, NY

Verdict

This action settled for $2,800,000.

Verdict Amount

$2,800,000.00

Case Details

XVII/25-47 LABOR LAW EXCAVATION SITE CAVES IN MULTIPLE FRACTURES TRANSECTED URETHRA RETROPERITONEAL HEMATOMA

SETTLEMENT: Robert Ryan v. Cedar Grove Cemetery Association; and Gasoline Installations, Inc. v. Malbro, Inc. 7534/95 Date of Settlement 10/28/99 Queens Supreme

Pltf. Atty: Walter Beck of Beck & Iannuzzi, Brooklyn

This action settled for $2,800,000. At 12 PM on 3/1/94, Pltf., age 46 at the time of trial, was employed as a laborer by Third-party Deft. and was working at the Cedar Grove Cemetery on 63rd Rd. in Queens. Deft. Gasoline Installations was the general contractor for the job. Pltf. was standing in an approximately 12-foot-deep excavation and was installing underground gasoline tanks when the sides of the excavation caved in and crushed him.

Pltf. claimed that Defts. Cedar Grove (the owner of the cemetery) and Gasoline Installations were statutorily liable pursuant to Labor Law ?241( 6) and Rule 23-4 of the Industrial Code, which require that an excavation in excess of 3 feet in depth be shored and sheeted to prevent cave-ins.

Pltf. was granted summary judgment against Defts. Although summary judgment against Third-party Deft. was never granted by the Court, it was conceded that since Third-party Deft. was in total control of the job, liability would be passed through to Deft. Malbro.

Injuries: fractured pelvis and lower left leg; transected urethra; retroperitoneal hematoma with traumatic erectile dysfunction. Pltf. claimed that as a result of his injuries, he is incapable of gainful employment. A projected $750,000 in lost earnings (present value) was included in the settlement amount. Carrier: Hanover.

Pltf. Experts: Dr. Edmond Provder, vocational rehabilitation, Manhattan; Seymour Barcun, Ph.D., economist, Metuchen, New Jersey; Domingo Isasi, P.E., engineer, Norwalk, Connecticut; John Garretto, engineer, Rockville Centre.

Deft. Expert: Howard Edelson, safety, Plainview.

Disclaimer: The information on this website and blog is for general informational purposes only and is not professional advice. We make no guarantees of accuracy or completeness. We disclaim all liability for errors, omissions, or reliance on this content. Always consult a qualified professional for specific guidance.

RECENT POSTS

Attorney reviewing a plaintiff's future care report
October 5, 2026
Learn which reporting mistakes can weaken serious injury cases, from unsupported care needs to poor cost research, outdated records, and unclear expert opinions.
Attorney reviewing a serious injury case
September 21, 2026
Learn what attorneys should look for when choosing a future care expert, including credentials, clinical experience, report quality, and litigation readiness.
Injury case documents and medical records
September 7, 2026
Learn which actions can damage a personal injury case, from delayed treatment to poor documentation. Discover practical ways to protect evidence and support future damages.
Expert reviewing medical records
August 24, 2026
Learn how a medical needs assessment helps identify future care, daily living needs, and functional limits in serious injury cases. Discover what makes the process reliable.
Expert comparing future medical cost reports
August 3, 2026
Learn how a medical cost projection differs from a life care plan. See which report may better document future medical needs in a complex injury claim.

CONTACT US