Anthony D Agostino v. Richard Paty, Jr. and Richard Paty, Sr.

Anthony D Agostino v. Richard Paty, Jr. and Richard Paty, Sr.

Case Name

Anthony D Agostino v. Richard Paty, Jr. and Richard Paty, Sr.

Type of Injury

DISLOCATION FRACTURE OF THE CERVICAL SPINE

Occupation

landscaper

Location

Suffolk, NY

Verdict

$610,164, plus interest (5/1).

Verdict Amount

$610,164.00

Case Details

XIV/47-15 MOTOR VEHICLE PASSENGER DISLOCATION FRACTURE OF THE CERVICAL SPINE SUMMARY JUDGMENT ON LIABILITY

Anthony D Agostino v. Richard Paty, Jr. and Richard Paty, Sr. 23607/93 8-day trial Verdict 4/16/97 Judge Peter Fox Cohalan, Suffolk Supreme

VERDICT: $610,164, plus interest (5/1). Breakdown: $325,000 for past pain and suffering; $42,745 for past medical expenses; $51, 384 for past lost earnings; $175,000 for future pain and suffering; $ 16,035 for future lost earnings. Jury: 4 male, 2 female.

Pltf. Atty: Michael Carner of Sarisohn, Sarisohn, Carner, LeBow, Braun & Castrovinci, Commack

Deft. Atty: Marcy D. Sheinwold of Lewis, Johs, Avallone, Aviles & Kaufman, Melville

Facts: Pltf., a 38-year-old landscaper, testified that on 8/30/93 shortly after 12 AM he was a passenger in a car driven by Deft. Paty, Jr. He claimed that they were traveling on Harned Rd. in Commack when the car suddenly left the road and hit a tree and utility pole. Pltf. was granted summary judgment on liability in September 1995 and this trial was on damages only.

Injuries: hangman s fracture dislocation at C2-3 ultimately resulting in a spontaneous spinal fusion at C1, 2, and 3. He wore a halo brace for 10 weeks. Pltf. claimed that he has severe permanent restriction of motion in the neck. He received physical therapy and acupuncture treatment. Pltf. testified that he cannot return to work as a landscaper and that he cannot perform sedentary work. He also testified that he has not driven a car since the accident. Pltf. s economist testified that his future lost earnings would be approximately $750,000. Deft. denied that there was a spinal fusion at C1-2 and contended that the restriction of motion was not as severe as Pltf. claimed. Deft. contended that Pltf. only had a mild to moderate disability, and that he was employable in a variety of sedentary jobs.

Demonstrative evidence: X-rays; 3-D CAT scan reconstruction; MRI films; hospital records; physical therapy and acupuncture records; model and computer-generated diagrams of the spine. Specials: $42, 745 for medical expenses; $51,384 for lost earnings. Final offer: $ 750,000; demand: $950,000. Jury deliberation: 4 hours. Carrier: Allstate. Pltf. Experts: Dr. Allen Zippin, neurosurgeon, Smithtown; Edmond Provder, vocational rehabilitation, Manhattan; Alan Leiken, Ph.D., economist, Stony Brook. Deft. Experts: Dr. James Sarno, neurosurgeon, Hempstead; Morris Ehrenreich, Ph.D., vocational rehabilitation, Manhattan; Dr. John Killian, orth. surg., Hempstead.

Disclaimer: The information on this website and blog is for general informational purposes only and is not professional advice. We make no guarantees of accuracy or completeness. We disclaim all liability for errors, omissions, or reliance on this content. Always consult a qualified professional for specific guidance.

RECENT POSTS

Family discussing long-term life care planning
June 1, 2026
Learn how long-term care planning helps families prepare for future personal care needs. Practical steps and expert guidance for creating a life care plan.
How Care Planning Improves Legal and Medical Outcomes
May 18, 2026
Learn how care plan management and life care planning improve medical treatment, legal documentation, recovery support, and long-term patient outcomes.
OAS personal injury evaluation covering brain, spinal, and trauma injuries assessment
May 4, 2026
Learn how Occupational Assessment Services evaluates injury types in personal injury cases. Understand brain, spinal, and emotional injury impacts clearly.
Understanding Gross Negligence with OAS Injury Assessments
April 20, 2026
In this guide, we’ll break down what gross negligence means, how it differs from standard negligence, and why it matters in a personal injury case evaluation.
Personal injury lawsuit process overview with OAS expert support
April 6, 2026
Learn the full personal injury lawsuit process and how OAS expert services strengthen cases, improve evidence, and help maximize compensation outcomes.

CONTACT US