Gurmeet Singh and Surinder Kaur v. Thomas Alfano and MetLife Investments / Bahadur Singh, Harbinder Kaur, Sukhwant Singh, Jagdev Kaur, Jaib Singh, Mandee Kaur and Gurmeet Singh v. Thomas Alfano and...

Gurmeet Singh and Surinder Kaur v. Thomas Alfano and MetLife Investments / Bahadur Singh, Harbinder Kaur, Sukhwant Singh, Jagdev Kaur, Jaib Singh, Mandee Kaur and Gurmeet Singh v. Thomas Alfano and...

Case Name

Gurmeet Singh and Surinder Kaur v. Thomas Alfano and MetLife Investments / Bahadur Singh, Harbinder Kaur, Sukhwant Singh, Jagdev Kaur, Jaib Singh, Mandee Kaur and Gurmeet Singh v. Thomas Alfano and MetLife Investments

Type of Injury

SPINE INJURIES

Occupation

Taxi Driver

Location

Mercer County, New Jersey

Verdict

The jury found that Bahadur Singh had sustained a permanent injury under the verbal tort threshold and was awarded $856,000 in damages. Singh’s wife, Harbinder Kaur, received $22,000 for her loss of consortium claim. Their combined total award was $878,000. However, the jury also found that Singh’s failure to undergo fusion surgery constituted contributory negligence of 40 percent.

The $878,000 damages award was reduced by 40 percent, to $526,800.

The award was to be paid by Alfano’s insurer, Liberty Mutual Insurance Co.

The jury returned no cause of action verdicts for Sukhwant Singh and Ajaib Singh, in favor of the defense.

Verdict Amount

$526,800

Case Details

On April 15, 2010, plaintiff Bahadur Singh, a taxi driver in his 50s, was the front-seat passenger in a vehicle heading south on the New Jersey Turnpike, near Robbinsville Township. In the back seat were plaintiffs Sukhwant Singh and Ajaib Singh, also taxi drivers. The car’s driver was Gurmeet Singh.

The Singhs were traveling in the left lane of the turnpike when another vehicle attempted to pass a truck and moved from the right lane into the left lane, rear-ending them. The Singhs claimed multiple spine injuries.

Bahadur Singh, Sukhwant Singh, and Ajaib Singh sued the driver of the other vehicle, Thomas Alfano, alleging that he had been negligent in failing to avoid the collision. Alfano’s employer, MetLife Investments, was named as a defendant, since Alfano had been driving in his capacity as an employee.

(The lawsuit was consolidated with another suit brought by Gurmeet Singh and his wife against Alfano and MetLife, which was settled several months prior to trial, for $25,000.)

Counsel for Alfano conceded liability, prior to trial.

Disclaimer: The information on this website and blog is for general informational purposes only and is not professional advice. We make no guarantees of accuracy or completeness. We disclaim all liability for errors, omissions, or reliance on this content. Always consult a qualified professional for specific guidance.

RECENT POSTS

Importance of a Vocational Expert in TDIU Cases
June 2, 2025
Learn how oasinc vocational experts play a crucial role in TDIU cases and how their testimony can strengthen disability claims for veterans seeking benefits
When and Why to Call a Vocational Expert for Evaluations - Oasinc
May 19, 2025
Exploring what vocational evaluations are, how a vocational expert helps, and when is the right time to call oasinc vocation expert for evaluations. Learn More!
The Role of Vocational Experts in SSD Hearings - Oasinc
May 5, 2025
Learn how the role of a vocational experts enhances your SSD hearing and impact disability benefits. Learn how Oasinc Vocational Assessment Helpful in SSD Cases
What is the Role of the Vocational Expert? - OAS
April 21, 2025
What is the Role of the Vocational Expert? Explore what a Vocational Expert does, why they matter, and how Oasinc Vocational Expert services can help.
Why Are Vocational Experts Necessary in Personal Injury Cases?
April 7, 2025
Vocational Experts in Personal Injury Cases as they assess how an injury affects a person's ability to work and determine the impact on earning capacity.

CONTACT US