Fred and Mary Olsen v. City of New York

Fred and Mary Olsen v. City of New York

Case Name

Fred and Mary Olsen v. City of New York

Type of Injury

HERNIATED DISC

Occupation

new york city police officer

Location

New York, NY

Verdict

Defense verdict.

Verdict Amount

$0.00

Case Details

IV/6-83 JONES ACT – HARBOR PATROL POLICE OFFICER FALLS ON GANGWAY – HERNIATED DISC

Fred and Mary Olsen v. City of New York 83 Civ 0462 5-day trial Verdict 3/19/85 Judge Constance Baker Motley, Southern District

VERDICT: Defense verdict.

Pltf. Atty: Stanley F. Meltzer of Meltzer & Fishman, Manhattan

Deft. Atty: Vito A. Cannavo, Asst. Corp. Counsel

Facts: Pltf. was a 31-year-old New York City police officer assigned to the Harbor Unit of the police department. He claimed that on 12/2/81, he slipped and fell on a gangway while entering a police harbor boat. Pltf. brought this action under the Jones Act, claiming that the surface of the ramp was not skid-resistant. Pltf. also alleged that the gangway was set at too steep an angle (35G). Pltf. called several other police officers as eyewitnesses. They also testified that they had complained about the condition of the gangway to their superiors before the accident. Deft. contended that there was insufficient proof that the accident occurred at the time and place that Pltf. alleged. In addition, Deft. argued that if the accident occurred as Pltf. described, he was contributorily negligent in failing to use an available handrail and in not wearing nonskid deck shoes. In response, Pltf. argued that he was not allowed to wear deck shoes. Deft. also called the sergeant who supervised Pltf. He testified that no complaints regarding the condition of the gangway were made to him. Injuries: herniated discs at L-4, L-5 and L-5, S-1 (confirmed by CAT scan). Pltf. retired from the police department on disability. An economist testified that Pltf.’s lost earnings amounted to $ 600,000. Deft. called a neurologist who testified that Pltf.’s back injuries were apparently preexisting. Amount asked of jury: $2,500,000. Pltf. Experts: Howard Silfin, engineer; Herbert Stillwaggon, maritime expert; Irwin Stricker, economist; Dr. Edmond Prouder, rehabilitative medicine; Dr. Mark Kashen, radiologist, Great Neck; Dr. Gary Korenman, neurologist, Manhattan; Dr. Stephen Zolan, orth. surg., Hicksville. Deft. Expert: Dr. Murray Budabin, neurologist, Manhattan.

Disclaimer: The information on this website and blog is for general informational purposes only and is not professional advice. We make no guarantees of accuracy or completeness. We disclaim all liability for errors, omissions, or reliance on this content. Always consult a qualified professional for specific guidance.

RECENT POSTS

Expert comparing future medical cost reports
August 3, 2026
Learn how a medical cost projection differs from a life care plan. See which report may better document future medical needs in a complex injury claim.
Specialist filing personal injury litigation
July 20, 2026
Learn how functional capacity evaluations document work limits and support injury claims. See how testing clarifies employability and earning capacity.
Long-term care assessment documents
July 6, 2026
Discover how future care planning helps document medical needs, support damage assessments, and strengthen personal injury claims with evidence-based evaluations.
Expert reviewing injury case records
June 22, 2026
Learn how a personal injury life care plan is developed and how expert analysis helps establish future damages that can withstand legal scrutiny and review.
Family discussing long-term life care planning
June 1, 2026
Learn how long-term care planning helps families prepare for future personal care needs. Practical steps and expert guidance for creating a life care plan.

CONTACT US