Essam Eliraky v. Arthur Staloff and Alpine Refrigeration

Essam Eliraky v. Arthur Staloff and Alpine Refrigeration

Case Name

Essam Eliraky v. Arthur Staloff and Alpine Refrigeration

Type of Injury

NECK FUSION, BACK INJURIES

Occupation

Delivery-car driver

Location

Middlesex County, NJ

Verdict

The parties settled for $1.1 million, prior to jury selection.

Verdict Amount

$1,100,000

Case Details

On Nov. 12, 2012, plaintiff Essam Eliraky, a livery-car driver in his late 40s, was working when he was rear-ended in slowing traffic by a pickup truck on Easton Avenue, in New Brunswick. He claimed an aggravation of neck and back injuries.

Eliraky sued the driver, Arthur Staloff, and his employer, Alpine Refrigeration, alleging that Staloff was negligent in the operation of a vehicle.

Staloff said that the brake had failed. The responding officer discovered brake fluid underneath Staloff’s truck.

Eliraky’s automotive expert inspected Staloff’s truck and reviewed photographs of the brake lines (the brake lines were changed post-accident). He said, based on the investigation, Staloff’s testimony, and the observation of brake fluid, the truck was not properly maintained, and the brake lines were not inspected, cleaned, and kept up to date; as a result, the brakes had corroded and failed.

Staloff’s automotive expert, who analyzed the same evidence as Eliraky’s expert, determined that the brake failure was a spontaneous, unforeseeable occurrence, and not the result of any alleged improper maintenance.

Disclaimer: The information on this website and blog is for general informational purposes only and is not professional advice. We make no guarantees of accuracy or completeness. We disclaim all liability for errors, omissions, or reliance on this content. Always consult a qualified professional for specific guidance.

RECENT POSTS

Expert reviewing future medical needs in a catastrophic injury case
October 19, 2026
Learn how future care planning helps document medical needs, support damages, and clarify long-term care in catastrophic injury cases.
Attorney reviewing a plaintiff's future care report
October 5, 2026
Learn which reporting mistakes can weaken serious injury cases, from unsupported care needs to poor cost research, outdated records, and unclear expert opinions.
Attorney reviewing a serious injury case
September 21, 2026
Learn what attorneys should look for when choosing a future care expert, including credentials, clinical experience, report quality, and litigation readiness.
Injury case documents and medical records
September 7, 2026
Learn which actions can damage a personal injury case, from delayed treatment to poor documentation. Discover practical ways to protect evidence and support future damages.
Expert reviewing medical records
August 24, 2026
Learn how a medical needs assessment helps identify future care, daily living needs, and functional limits in serious injury cases. Discover what makes the process reliable.

CONTACT US