Thorsten Gigger v. Sidney Fein, Evelyne Jeanniton, Ajay General Contracting, K.B.M. Design; R&D Home Improvement, and Superior Aluminum Products

Thorsten Gigger v. Sidney Fein, Evelyne Jeanniton, Ajay General Contracting, K.B.M. Design; R&D Home Improvement, and Superior Aluminum Products

Case Name

Thorsten Gigger v. Sidney Fein, Evelyne Jeanniton, Ajay General Contracting, K.B.M. Design; R&D Home Improvement, and Superior Aluminum Products

Type of Injury

PARAPLEGIA

Occupation

self-employed excavator

Location

Suffolk, NY

Verdict

This action settled for $3,050,000 during trial.

Verdict Amount

$3,050,000.00

Case Details

XVI/27-48 LABOR LAW PORTICO FALLS ON EXCAVATOR FAILURE TO PROVIDE SAFETY EQUIPMENT PARAPLEGIA

SETTLEMENT: Thorsten Gigger v. Sidney Fein, Evelyne Jeanniton, Ajay General Contracting, K.B.M. Design; R&D Home Improvement, and Superior Aluminum Products 4209/95 Dates of Settlement 9/24/98, 10/27/98 Suffolk Supreme

Pltf. Atty: Gerald Lotto, Bohemia

Michael S. Levine of Gandin, Schotsky, Rappaport, Glass & Greene, Melville

This action settled for $3,050,000 during trial. Pltf., a 31-year- old self-employed excavator, claimed that he was injured on 1/25/95 at 12 PM while performing excavation work on a multi-family dwelling located at 28-05 Bell Blvd. in Bayside. It was owned by Defts. Fein and Jeanniton. Deft. Ajay was the general contractor, and it hired Deft. K.B.M. to excavate a new driveway and parking area on the south side of the building and remove the stoop at the south entrance. Deft. K.B.M. subcontracted Pltf. to remove with his backhoe the existing dirt in the area where the driveway and parking lot were to be located.

Pltf. claimed that an employee of K.B.M. asked him to check two columns on the stoop, which were supporting a portico, to determine if they were weight bearing. He contended that he grabbed one column with both hands and moved it in a spinning fashion and kicked it one to three times with the inside of his foot. The column then moved without warning, and the portico fell onto Pltf. Pltf. claimed that Defts. Fein, Jeanniton, Ajay, and K.B.M. failed to provide him with adequate safety devices as required by Labor Law ?240(1). Pltf. also argued that Deft. R&D Home Improvements negligently installed the columns because they were not affixed to the roof or stoop. Pltf. also contended that Deft. Superior Aluminum provided negligent instructions for the installation of the columns, which did not require that they be secured in place with “L” brackets.

Defts. Fein, Jeanniton, Ajay, and K.B.M. contended that Labor Law ? 240(1) did not apply. Deft. R&D argued that it properly installed the columns and that it followed the manufacturer’s instructions when installing them. Deft. Superior contended that its instructions were adequate and that the accident was caused by Pltf.’s own negligence.

Injuries: paraplegia; incontinence; impotence. Demonstrative evidence: model of construction site; photos of site; MRIs; illustrations of spine. Specials: $150,000 for medical expenses. No offer; demand: $3, 000,000 from Fein, Jeanniton, Ajay, K.B.M., and R&D; $1,500,000 from Superior. Carriers: Nationwide for R&D; Maryland Commercial for K.B.M.; Transtate for Fein and Jeanniton; Continental for Ajay Contracting. Settlement apportionment: $450,000 paid by Fein and Jeanniton; $450,000 paid by Ajay Construction; $800,000 paid by K.B.M.; $600,000 paid by R&D Home; $750,000 paid by Superior. Note: Defts. Fein, Jeanniton, Ajay, K.B. M., and R&D settled on 9/24/98; Deft. Superior settled on 10/27/98 during deliberations.

Pltf. Experts: Dr. Thomas Mauri, orth. surg., Great Neck; Dr. Barry Root, physical and rehabilitative medicine, Glen Cove; Dr. Alan Mechanic, neurologist, Garden City; Dr. Edmond Provder, vocational rehabilitation, Manhattan; Alan Leiken, Ph.D., economist, East Setauket; Jerome Connor, Sc.D., engineer, Cambridge, Massachusetts; Jean Miele, architect, Middle Village.

Deft. Experts: Robert Ratay, Ph.D., civil engineer, Brooklyn; James Maloney, engineer, Mineola; Morris Ehrenreich, Ph.D., vocational rehabilitation, Westbury.

Disclaimer: The information on this website and blog is for general informational purposes only and is not professional advice. We make no guarantees of accuracy or completeness. We disclaim all liability for errors, omissions, or reliance on this content. Always consult a qualified professional for specific guidance.

RECENT POSTS

Importance of a Vocational Expert in TDIU Cases
June 2, 2025
Learn how oasinc vocational experts play a crucial role in TDIU cases and how their testimony can strengthen disability claims for veterans seeking benefits
When and Why to Call a Vocational Expert for Evaluations - Oasinc
May 19, 2025
Exploring what vocational evaluations are, how a vocational expert helps, and when is the right time to call oasinc vocation expert for evaluations. Learn More!
The Role of Vocational Experts in SSD Hearings - Oasinc
May 5, 2025
Learn how the role of a vocational experts enhances your SSD hearing and impact disability benefits. Learn how Oasinc Vocational Assessment Helpful in SSD Cases
What is the Role of the Vocational Expert? - OAS
April 21, 2025
What is the Role of the Vocational Expert? Explore what a Vocational Expert does, why they matter, and how Oasinc Vocational Expert services can help.
Why Are Vocational Experts Necessary in Personal Injury Cases?
April 7, 2025
Vocational Experts in Personal Injury Cases as they assess how an injury affects a person's ability to work and determine the impact on earning capacity.

CONTACT US