Soricelli v. Marquez, et al.

Soricelli v. Marquez, et al.

Case Name

Soricelli v. Marquez, et al.

Type of Injury

TORN ACHILLES TENDON

Occupation

salesperson

Location

Bronx, NY

Verdict

This $225,000 settlement, before jury selection, arose out of an accident that occurred on 7/5/93

Verdict Amount

$225,000.00

Case Details

XIV/34-31 MOTOR VEHICLE REAR END TORN ACHILLES TENDON

SETTLEMENT: Soricelli v. Marquez, et al. 24241/93 Date of Settlement 10/6/96 Bronx Supreme

Pltf. Atty: Robert A. Hyman, Tarrytown

This $225,000 settlement, before jury selection, arose out of an accident that occurred on 7/5/93 at the intersection of Central Park Ave. and Crisfield St. in Yonkers. Pltf., a 40-year-old salesperson at the time, claimed that Deft. s truck hit his car in the rear while he was stopped at a red light. Pltf. was granted summary judgment on liability after depositions.

Injuries: tear of the left Achilles tendon requiring surgery and a tendon autograft; nightmares. Pltf. underwent physical therapy and a second procedure to remove the suture. He has a limp and occasionally uses a cane. After emergency room treatment on the date of the accident, Pltf. did not seek further treatment for the injury until 6 weeks after the accident, and Deft. would have denied causation and argued that it was improbable that Pltf. could have walked on the injured foot for that long a period without seeking medical treatment. Demonstrative evidence: CAT scans; X-rays; surgical photos. Specials: $30,000 for medical expenses; $ 20,000 for lost earnings. Pltf. Experts: Pltf. would have called Dr. Martin O Malley, orth. surg. (by videotape); Edmond Provder, vocational rehabilitation, Manhattan; Dr. Arthur Greenspan, neuropsychiatrist, Manhattan. Deft. Expert: Deft. would have called Dr. Robert Richman, orth. surg., Manhattan.

Disclaimer: The information on this website and blog is for general informational purposes only and is not professional advice. We make no guarantees of accuracy or completeness. We disclaim all liability for errors, omissions, or reliance on this content. Always consult a qualified professional for specific guidance.

RECENT POSTS

Attorney reviewing a plaintiff's future care report
October 5, 2026
Learn which reporting mistakes can weaken serious injury cases, from unsupported care needs to poor cost research, outdated records, and unclear expert opinions.
Attorney reviewing a serious injury case
September 21, 2026
Learn what attorneys should look for when choosing a future care expert, including credentials, clinical experience, report quality, and litigation readiness.
Injury case documents and medical records
September 7, 2026
Learn which actions can damage a personal injury case, from delayed treatment to poor documentation. Discover practical ways to protect evidence and support future damages.
Expert reviewing medical records
August 24, 2026
Learn how a medical needs assessment helps identify future care, daily living needs, and functional limits in serious injury cases. Discover what makes the process reliable.
Expert comparing future medical cost reports
August 3, 2026
Learn how a medical cost projection differs from a life care plan. See which report may better document future medical needs in a complex injury claim.

CONTACT US