Blog Layout

Pezzullo v. Raymond and Arlene Rumbowski; Rohan Swimming Pool Center; George Rohan

Pezzullo v. Raymond and Arlene Rumbowski; Rohan Swimming Pool Center; George Rohan

Case Name

Pezzullo v. Raymond and Arlene Rumbowski; Rohan Swimming Pool Center; George Rohan

Type of Injury

SUCCESSOR CORPORATION ISSUE

Occupation

correction facility guard

Location

NY

Verdict

This was a structured settlement, made before jury selection, with a guaranteed payout of $1,898,672.

Verdict Amount

$1,898,672.00

Case Details

VII/21-41 SWIMMING POOL ACCIDENT – QUADRIPLEGIA – SUCCESSOR CORPORATION ISSUE

SETTLEMENT Pezzullo v. Raymond and Arlene Rumbowski; Rohan Swimming Pool Center; George Rohan; and Royal Pools & Spas, Inc. 2280/85 Date of Settlement 8/88 Orange Supreme

Pltf. Atty: John J. Basso of Spiegel, Pergament, Brown & Basso, Poughkeepsie

This was a structured settlement, made before jury selection, with a guaranteed payout of $1,898,672.

The accident occurred on 8/6/83. Pltf., a 25-year-old correction facility guard, was a guest at a party at Deft. Rumbowski’s home. He dove into the shallow end of Deft.’s pool and struck his head on the bottom. Pltf. was rendered a quadriplegic and is confined to a wheelchair. Pltf. claimed that the pool did not have lights, depth or warning markers, and no reference points indicating its deep and shallow ends. Pltf. also claimed that Rohan Swimming Pool Center negligently designed, constructed, and installed the pool, according to standard safety precautions and advancements pursuant to National Swimming Pool Institute recommendations. Evidence indicated that Deft. Rohan Swimming Pool Center built the pool for Deft. Rumbowski about 15 years before this incident. Several years before the accident, Rohan sold the business to Deft. Royal Pools & Spas, which consisted of the same employees, business, and customer lists. The new owner was Deft. George Rohan’s son-in-law. The old and new corporations shared newspaper ads which stated: “same corporation, new name only.” At the time of the incident, Rohan was out of business and uninsured. Pltf. claimed that Deft. Royal Pools was negligent on the theory of successor corporation liability and a continuing duty to warn based on advancements in the safety field. Injuries: spinal cord trauma at C-3 resulting in quadriplegia. Pltf. can move his arms but has no fine motor movement in his hands. Demonstrative evidence: “Day in the Life” film, as part of a videotape settlement brochure distributed to all counsel and insurance carriers; scale model of swimming pool; blowup of survey of homeowner policy. Specials: $500,000. Pltf. Experts (on the videotaped brochure): George Lawniczak, Jr., Ph.D., water safety, Las Vegas, Nevada; Edmond Provder, vocational evaluation, Manhattan; Andrew Weintraub, Ph.D., economist, Temple Univ.

RECENT POSTS

Medicaid Long Term Care Explained
25 Mar, 2024
Medicaid Long Term Care includes various programs that can help financially challenged seniors receive the care they need.
What Is Court Testimony
18 Mar, 2024
The question of what is court testimony can be confusing for those who aren’t legal professionals, primarily due to the fact witnesses fall into two distinct categories.
What Is Demonstrative Evidence In A Personal Injury Case
11 Mar, 2024
Demonstrative evidence can clarify the facts of the case and convince a jury of your claims.
Loss Of Earning Capacity
04 Mar, 2024
Loss of earning capacity can be awarded in a personal injury case and may help you recover financially after suffering an injury.
VA Disability Increase 2024
26 Feb, 2024
The VA disability increase 2024 is a good measure to fight inflation that may not be enough to account for the needs of all veterans.

CONTACT US

Share by: