Michael Hodor v. William Kooyker and Terence R. Kooyker

Michael Hodor v. William Kooyker and Terence R. Kooyker

Case Name

Michael Hodor v. William Kooyker and Terence R. Kooyker

Type of Injury

NECK INJURY AND FUSION

Occupation

Technologist

Location

New York, New York

Verdict

The parties negotiated a pretrial settlement. The defendants’ insurer agreed to pay $5.5 million.

Verdict Amount

$5,500,000

Case Details

At about 1 a.m. on July 18, 2009, plaintiff Michael Hodor, 30, a technologist, was a passenger of a car that was being driven by Terence Kooyker, who was traveling on Amsterdam Avenue, near its intersection at West 72nd Street, in Manhattan. Kooyker lost control of the vehicle, and the vehicle mounted a sidewalk and struck a lamppost. Hodor claimed that he sustained an injury of his neck.

Hodor sued Kooyker and the vehicle’s owner, Willem Kooyker. Hodor alleged that Terence Kooyker was negligent in the operation of his vehicle. Hodor further alleged that Willem Kooyker was vicariously liable for Terence Kooyker’s actions.

Hodor claimed that the accident occurred during wet conditions. He further claimed that Terence Kooyker was speeding and not exercising due caution.

Kooyker claimed that he lost control while attempting to avoid a taxi that had veered into the immediate path of his car. Defense counsel attempted to invoke the emergency doctrine, which prevents the attachment of liability to motorists who reasonably and prudently respond to a sudden, unexpected emergency that necessitates a speedy reaction.

Disclaimer: The information on this website and blog is for general informational purposes only and is not professional advice. We make no guarantees of accuracy or completeness. We disclaim all liability for errors, omissions, or reliance on this content. Always consult a qualified professional for specific guidance.

RECENT POSTS

Expert reviewing future medical needs in a catastrophic injury case
October 19, 2026
Learn how future care planning helps document medical needs, support damages, and clarify long-term care in catastrophic injury cases.
Attorney reviewing a plaintiff's future care report
October 5, 2026
Learn which reporting mistakes can weaken serious injury cases, from unsupported care needs to poor cost research, outdated records, and unclear expert opinions.
Attorney reviewing a serious injury case
September 21, 2026
Learn what attorneys should look for when choosing a future care expert, including credentials, clinical experience, report quality, and litigation readiness.
Injury case documents and medical records
September 7, 2026
Learn which actions can damage a personal injury case, from delayed treatment to poor documentation. Discover practical ways to protect evidence and support future damages.
Expert reviewing medical records
August 24, 2026
Learn how a medical needs assessment helps identify future care, daily living needs, and functional limits in serious injury cases. Discover what makes the process reliable.

CONTACT US