Blog Layout

Mark Lopez v. KMA Builders Corp. v. T&E Nielson Assoc.

Mark Lopez v. KMA Builders Corp. v. T&E Nielson Assoc.

Case Name

Mark Lopez v. KMA Builders Corp. v. T&E Nielson Assoc.

Type of Injury

AMPUTATION OF TIP OF ONE FINGER

Occupation

carpenter

Location

Suffolk, NY

Verdict

Liability: Nielson 70%; KMA 30% negligent (6/0). Pltf. and Defts. had previously agreed to a $150,000 settlement, and the trial was held to determine the apportionment of liability between Deft. and Third-party Deft

Verdict Amount

$150,000.00

Case Details

XVII/5-24 LABOR LAW FALL FROM RAMP AMPUTATION OF TIP OF ONE FINGER

Mark Lopez v. KMA Builders Corp. v. T&E Nielson Assoc. 445/95 2-day trial Verdict 5/26/99 Suffolk Supreme

Judge: Howard Berler

Verdict: Liability: Nielson 70%; KMA 30% negligent (6/0). Pltf. and Defts. had previously agreed to a $150,000 settlement, and the trial was held to determine the apportionment of liability between Deft. and Third-party Deft. Jury: 4 male, 2 female.

Pltf. Atty: John L. Buonora of Gallo & Buonora, Commack

Deft. Atty: David Fowler of McCabe, Collins, McGeough & Fowler, Mineola

Robert M. Bridges of Jacobson & Schwartz, Rockville Centre

Facts: Pltf., a 21-year-old carpenter, was injured on 3/3/93 while working at a site for the construction of a new home in Southampton. Pltf. claimed that he was carrying a piece of lumber that was 2×10 inches wide and 20 feet long up a ramp when he slipped on mud and fell several feet. He testified that he grabbed the foundation wall and that the piece of lumber came down on his finger. Pltf. contended that Deft. violated Labor Law ??240 and 241. Defts. conceded liability, and agreed to a settlement of $150,000. The trial was held to determine the apportionment of liability between Deft., the general contractor, and Third-party Deft., the subcontractor.

Injuries: (not before the jury $150,000 settlement) partial amputation of the distal phalanx of the middle finger of the left ( nondominant) hand. Pltf. underwent several revision surgeries. He would have claimed a 40% loss of use of his hand and 100% loss of use of the finger. He would have contended that he is no longer able to grip or hold heavy objects. He never returned to work. Jury deliberation: approximately 1 hour. Carriers: Worchester for Nielson; Providence Washington Group for KMA.

Pltf. Experts: Pltf. would have called Benjamin Gastel, vocational rehabilitation, Port Washington; Dr. Hilton Adler, plastic surgeon, Stony Brook.

Deft. Experts: Deft. would have called Edmond Provder, vocational rehabilitation, Manhattan; Dr. Jerry Ellstein, hand surgeon, Huntington.

RECENT POSTS

Medicaid Long Term Care Explained
25 Mar, 2024
Medicaid Long Term Care includes various programs that can help financially challenged seniors receive the care they need.
What Is Court Testimony
18 Mar, 2024
The question of what is court testimony can be confusing for those who aren’t legal professionals, primarily due to the fact witnesses fall into two distinct categories.
What Is Demonstrative Evidence In A Personal Injury Case
11 Mar, 2024
Demonstrative evidence can clarify the facts of the case and convince a jury of your claims.
Loss Of Earning Capacity
04 Mar, 2024
Loss of earning capacity can be awarded in a personal injury case and may help you recover financially after suffering an injury.
VA Disability Increase 2024
26 Feb, 2024
The VA disability increase 2024 is a good measure to fight inflation that may not be enough to account for the needs of all veterans.

CONTACT US

Share by: