Manuel Bailon v. Stahl York Avenue Co., L.L.C.

Manuel Bailon v. Stahl York Avenue Co., L.L.C.

Case Name

Manuel Bailon v. Stahl York Avenue Co., L.L.C.

Type of Injury

TRAUMATIC BRAIN INJURY, HERNIATED DISC AND MEDIAL MENISCUS TEAR

Occupation

Painter

Location

New York, New York

Verdict

The parties negotiated a pretrial settlement. Stahl York Avenue’s primary insurer agreed to pay $1 million, and Stahl York Avenue’s excess insurer agreed to pay $1 million. Thus, the settlement totaled $2 million. The negotiations were mediated by Kenneth Grundstein, of National Arbitration and Mediation Inc.

Verdict Amount

$2,000,000

Case Details

On March 26, 2015, plaintiff Manuel Bailon, 49, a painter, worked at an apartment building that was located at 415 E. 64th St., in Manhattan. During the course of his work, he fell off of a closed A-frame ladder that he had leaned onto a stairwell’s wall. He landed on the stairway, and he claimed that he suffered injuries of his back, a knee, his neck and a shoulder.

Bailon sued the premises’ owner, Stahl York Avenue Co., LLC. He alleged that Stahl York Avenue negligently failed to provide a safe workplace. He further alleged that the company’s negligence constituted a violation of the New York State Labor Law.

Bailon claimed that the ladder was a necessary means of reaching the upper portion of the stairwell’s wall, but that it could not have been opened and properly deployed within the confines of the stairwell. Bailon’s counsel contended that the accident stemmed from an elevation-related hazard, as defined by Labor Law § 240(1), and that Bailon was not provided the proper, safe equipment that is a requirement of the statute.

Defense counsel claimed that Bailon had been provided poles that would have extended the reach of his painting tools and therefore eliminated a need for the ladder. Defense counsel also claimed that Bailon had been told that the ladder was not to be used.

Disclaimer: The information on this website and blog is for general informational purposes only and is not professional advice. We make no guarantees of accuracy or completeness. We disclaim all liability for errors, omissions, or reliance on this content. Always consult a qualified professional for specific guidance.

RECENT POSTS

Expert reviewing future medical needs in a catastrophic injury case
October 19, 2026
Learn how future care planning helps document medical needs, support damages, and clarify long-term care in catastrophic injury cases.
Attorney reviewing a plaintiff's future care report
October 5, 2026
Learn which reporting mistakes can weaken serious injury cases, from unsupported care needs to poor cost research, outdated records, and unclear expert opinions.
Attorney reviewing a serious injury case
September 21, 2026
Learn what attorneys should look for when choosing a future care expert, including credentials, clinical experience, report quality, and litigation readiness.
Injury case documents and medical records
September 7, 2026
Learn which actions can damage a personal injury case, from delayed treatment to poor documentation. Discover practical ways to protect evidence and support future damages.
Expert reviewing medical records
August 24, 2026
Learn how a medical needs assessment helps identify future care, daily living needs, and functional limits in serious injury cases. Discover what makes the process reliable.

CONTACT US