James Patrick Mills and James Mills v. City of New York and NYCHHC

James Patrick Mills and James Mills v. City of New York and NYCHHC

Case Name

James Patrick Mills and James Mills v. City of New York and NYCHHC

Type of Injury

PUNCTURED EARDRUM AND BACK AND NECK INJURIES

Location

New York, NY

Verdict

Settled during the damages trial for $35, 000.

Verdict Amount

$35,000

Case Details

VIII/22-4 MOTOR VEHICLE — COLLISION WITH AMBULANCE WITHOUT WARNING LIGHTS ON — NO-FAULT QUESTION ON PUNCTURED EARDRUM AND BACK AND NECK INJURIES

James Patrick Mills and James Mills v. City of New York and NYCHHC 13308/86 11-day trial Liability verdict 2/16/88 Damages verdict 9/25/90 Judge Leland G. DeGrasse, New York Supreme

VERDICT: Defense verdict on damages (no serious injury) in case of James Patrick Mills. Pltf.’s verdict on liability in a separate trial on 2/16/88. His son, James Mills, settled during the damages trial for $35, 000. Post-trial motions were denied. Jury: 3 male, 3 female.

Pltf. Atty: Patrick J. Fogarty of Fogarty & Fogarty, Mineola

Deft. Atty: Barbara S. Finger, Asst. Corp. Counsel, on liability ( 2/16/88)

Margaret Johnson-Pertet, Asst. Corp. Counsel, on damages

Facts: Pltf. James Patrick Mills, age 56 at the time of the accident, claimed that his vehicle collided with an ambulance on 1/7/82 at 3 AM at the intersection of 110th St. and Madison Ave. in Manhattan. The ambulance was on a call at the time. Pltf. claimed that Deft.’s ambulance did not have its lights and siren on. The jury found, in a separate liability trial on 2/16/88, that Defts. were 100% negligent, and this action proceeded on damages. Injuries: James Patrick Mills (age 56 at the time of the accident, defense verdict on damages) punctured eardrum; cervical radiculopathy; post-concussion syndrome; headaches; injuries to the back and neck. Deft. contended that Pltf.’s back injuries were preexisting and were not related to this accident. Deft. also denied that Pltf. sustained a serious injury under the No-Fault Law, Insurance Law ? 5102(d). James Mills (age 29, settled during damages trial for $35,000) fractured rib; fractured teeth; scar to the lip; concussion with post- concussion syndrome. Demonstrative evidence: economist’s chart of lost earnings and benefits; photo of the damage to Pltf.’s car. Specials: $575, 302 for lost earnings. Offer: $87,500; demand: $300,000; amount asked of jury: over $1,000,000. Jury deliberation: 3? hours. Pltf. Experts: Dr. George Forster, neurologist, Manhattan; Dr. Conrad Berenson, economist, Woodbury; Dr. Malvin Coren, g.p., Bronx; Edmond Provder, vocational rehabilitation, Manhattan. Deft. Experts: Dr. Ralph Olson, neurosurgeon, Manhattan; Dr. Morris Ehrenreich, vocational rehabilitation, Manhattan.

Disclaimer: The information on this website and blog is for general informational purposes only and is not professional advice. We make no guarantees of accuracy or completeness. We disclaim all liability for errors, omissions, or reliance on this content. Always consult a qualified professional for specific guidance.

RECENT POSTS

Demonstrative Evidence in Vocational Assessments
September 1, 2025
In this article, we’ll explore what demonstrative evidence is, why it matters in vocational assessments, and how it can make complex information easier.
Wrongful Death Case
August 18, 2025
Learn how a vocational evaluation for wrongful death cases can help calculate financial loss, strengthen your claim, and secure fair compensation. Call us Today
Vocational Evaluations Impact Personal Injury Settlements
August 4, 2025
In this blog post, we’ll explain what a vocational evaluation is, how it helps in personal injury settlements. Contact our Vocational expert for evaluation today
Life Care Plan Evaluation For Documenting Damages - Oasinc
July 21, 2025
Learn about what a life care plan is, when it is necessary, and why it’s such an important part of documenting damages after a serious injury. Call Oasinc today
Vocational Assessment Helpful in Employment Cases
July 7, 2025
Discover how OAS Vocational Assessments support employment cases, resolving disputes and strengthening legal claims. Gain key insights with expert analysis!

CONTACT US