Furia v. Reno v. SNH Construction

Furia v. Reno v. SNH Construction

Case Name

Furia v. Reno v. SNH Construction

Type of Injury

TRIMALLEOLAR ANKLE FRACTURE

Occupation

construction taper and spackler

Location

Queens, NY

Verdict

Directed verdict on liability. Reno 75%; SNH Construction 25% negligent. Settled during damages trial for $725,000.

Verdict Amount

$725,000.00

Case Details

VI/3-38 CONSTRUCTION ACCIDENT – SCAFFOLD – APPORTIONMENT TRIAL – SETTLEMENT FOR TRIMALLEOLAR ANKLE FRACTURE

Furia v. Reno v. SNH Construction Verdict 3/87 Judge Sidney Leviss, Queens Supreme

VERDICT: Directed verdict on liability. Reno 75%; SNH Construction 25% negligent. Settled during damages trial for $725,000.

Pltf. Atty: Jeff Battan

Deft. Atty: Gregory J. Parisi of Hogan, Jones & Parisi, Manhattan, for Reno

Scott C. Watson of J.M. Furey & R.J. Furey, Hempstead, for SNH Construction

Facts: Pltf. was a 40-year-old construction taper and spackler at the time of the accident. He was employed by SNH Construction, a subcontractor for Reno, the general contractor. The work was being done on a private home. Pltf. was working on a scaffold when he fell 12 feet to the ground. Pltf. claimed that Defts. violated ?240 of the Labor Law. He contended that improper planks were used on the scaffold, allowing him to fall through.

A directed verdict was granted on the issue of liability. As there was no indemnification contract between the two Defts., the jury decided only the percentage contribution between them. At issue was which of the parties was responsible for placing the planks on the day in question.

Injuries: trimalleolar ankle fracture requiring several operations. Pltf. walks with a cane. He is unable to work at his old job. Pltf.’s expert economist estimated Pltf.’s lost earnings as a union taper/spackler at $848,000. No offer; demand: $750,000. Pltf. Experts: Dr. Robert Reiss, orth. surg., Huntington; Dr. Conrad Berenson, economist, Woodbury; Edmond Provder, rehabilitation specialist.

Disclaimer: The information on this website and blog is for general informational purposes only and is not professional advice. We make no guarantees of accuracy or completeness. We disclaim all liability for errors, omissions, or reliance on this content. Always consult a qualified professional for specific guidance.

RECENT POSTS

Vocational Evaluation in Personal Injury Cases
October 20, 2025
Learn how vocational evaluation documents work capacity, future earning losses, and job limits to support personal injury claims. See OAS Inc’s approach.
The Role of a Vocational Expert in Determining Spousal Support
October 6, 2025
In this article, we’ll explain what a vocational expert does, why their role is important in vocational evaluation for divorce & matrimonial cases. Call us now
Life Care Planning Due To Medical Malpractice
September 22, 2025
Discover how life care planning works, why it matters in medical malpractice cases, and how it benefits both patients and the legal system. Contact OAS Today!
Demonstrative Evidence in Vocational Assessments
September 1, 2025
In this article, we’ll explore what demonstrative evidence is, why it matters in vocational assessments, and how it can make complex information easier.
Wrongful Death Case
August 18, 2025
Learn how a vocational evaluation for wrongful death cases can help calculate financial loss, strengthen your claim, and secure fair compensation. Call us Today

CONTACT US