Frank Besier v. NYCTA

Frank Besier v. NYCTA

Case Name

Frank Besier v. NYCTA

Type of Injury

BELOW-THE-KNEE AMPUTATION

Occupation

trucker’s helper

Location

New York, NY

Verdict

$2,275,000, reduced to $1,251,250 for 45% comparative negligence of Pltf. (5/1).

Verdict Amount

$1,251,250.00

Case Details

XI/49-2 SUBWAY ACCIDENT PASSENGER FALLS FROM BETWEEN SUBWAY CARS TO TRACKS BELOW-THE-KNEE AMPUTATION

Frank Besier v. NYCTA 40600/90 5-day trial Verdict 4/15/94 Judge Walter J. Relihan, Jr., New York Supreme

VERDICT: $2,275,000, reduced to $1,251,250 for 45% comparative negligence of Pltf. (5/1). Breakdown: $500,000 for past pain and suffering; $500,000 for future pain and suffering; $75,000 for past lost earnings; $1,200,000 for future lost earnings. Jury: 4 male, 2 female.

Pltf. Atty: Daniel Crupain of Crupain & Greenfield, Manhattan

Deft. Atty: Michael Figliolia, Brooklyn

Facts: The accident occurred on 7/16/88 at 1:50 AM at Deft.’s 57th St. subway station in Manhattan. Pltf., a 26-year-old trucker’s helper at the time, testified that he boarded the last car of a northbound train through a passenger door which opened in front of him where he was waiting on the platform of the Union Square station in Manhattan. He testified that he was the only one in the car, and during the ride uptown he realized that the passenger doors were not opening at the stations. Pltf. claimed that he attempted to go to the next car where he anticipated that the doors would be working. The door at the end of the car was unlocked and he stepped into the area between the subway cars, but the door to the next car was locked. Pltf. testified that he turned to go back to the first car when the train lurched, causing him to fall to the tracks. The train ran over him.

The subway cars are 75 feet long with large gaps between each one. Pltf.’s experts testified that the area was unsafe because they had inadequate barriers to prevent falls to the tracks. Pltf. contended that the subway car that he originally boarded should have been totally locked, including all of the passenger doors, and taken out of service.

Deft. denied that the accident occurred as Pltf. claimed, and contended that Pltf. was intoxicated and that he had attempted to board the train between the cars.

Injuries: traumatic below-the-knee amputation of the left leg; fracture of the right heel. Demonstrative evidence: models; photos; graphic drawings. No offer; demand: $3,000,000. Pltf. Experts: Alphus Robb, former NYCTA instructor, Far Rockaway; John Fruin, transportation engineer, Massapequa; Edmond Provder, vocational expert, Manhattan; Dr. Howard Balensweig, orth. surg., Manhattan. There was no expert testimony for Deft.

Disclaimer: The information on this website and blog is for general informational purposes only and is not professional advice. We make no guarantees of accuracy or completeness. We disclaim all liability for errors, omissions, or reliance on this content. Always consult a qualified professional for specific guidance.

RECENT POSTS

Vocational Evaluations Impact Personal Injury Settlements
August 4, 2025
In this blog post, we’ll explain what a vocational evaluation is, how it helps in personal injury settlements. Contact our Vocational expert for evaluation today
Life Care Plan Evaluation For Documenting Damages - Oasinc
July 21, 2025
Learn about what a life care plan is, when it is necessary, and why it’s such an important part of documenting damages after a serious injury. Call Oasinc today
Vocational Assessment Helpful in Employment Cases
July 7, 2025
Discover how OAS Vocational Assessments support employment cases, resolving disputes and strengthening legal claims. Gain key insights with expert analysis!
The Role of Vocational Experts in Evaluating Earning Capacity
June 23, 2025
Discover how oasinc vocational experts assess earning capacity, analyze skills, and provide insights for legal, insurance, or personal career decisions. Learn more!
Importance of a Vocational Expert in TDIU Cases
June 2, 2025
Learn how oasinc vocational experts play a crucial role in TDIU cases and how their testimony can strengthen disability claims for veterans seeking benefits

CONTACT US