David and Monica Revill v. Boston Road Development Corp. and Bronx Pro Real Estate

David and Monica Revill v. Boston Road Development Corp. and Bronx Pro Real Estate

Case Name

David and Monica Revill v. Boston Road Development Corp. and Bronx Pro Real Estate

Type of Injury

RAISED FLOOR BOARDS FOLLOWING APARTMENT BUILDING FLOOD – PROPERTY DAMAGE

Occupation

warehouse worker

Location

Bronx, NY

Verdict

Defense verdict on liability (5/1).

Verdict Amount

$0.00

Case Details

c

XVII/35-12 FALLDOWN RAISED FLOOR BOARDS FOLLOWING APARTMENT BUILDING FLOOD PROPERTY DAMAGE DEFENSE VERDICT ON LIABILITY

David and Monica Revill v. Boston Road Development Corp. and Bronx Pro Real Estate 18458/95 9-day trial Verdict 1/14/00 Bronx Supreme

Judge: Lucindo Suarez

Verdict: Defense verdict on liability (5/1). Jury: 2 male, 4 female.

Pltf. Atty: Steven Wildstein, Great Neck

Deft. Atty: Jack G. Russo of Meyer, Suozzi, English & Klein, Manhattan

Facts: Pltf., a 37-year-old warehouse worker, claimed that in April 1995, a pipe burst in the heat riser of Defts. apartment building, causing his apartment to flood. Pltf. s apartment was located on the main floor, and his entire apartment was flooded with several inches of water. Deft. produced a videotape of the flood. He claimed $24,000 for property damage. The water was ultimately drained, and Pltf. s floor boards buckled. Several days after the accident, Pltf. tripped and fell over one of the floor boards in his bedroom. Pltf. claimed that Deft. was negligent for failing to repair the floor after the flood. Pltf. s expert testified that the floor constituted a dangerous condition. Defts. claimed that Pltf. was offered the opportunity to move out, but he did not move. They also claimed that Pltf. knew the floor was defective in the bedroom, but that he chose to go into the bedroom anyway.

Injuries: torn anterior cruciate ligament requiring two surgeries with hospitalizations. Pltf. claimed that he requires the use of a cane. Pltf. s vocational rehabilitation expert testified that Pltf. can only work at sedentary jobs that have less earning potential than his former job. Demonstrative evidence: videotape; wage projection charts. Jury deliberation: 45 minutes. Carrier: United International.

Pltf. Experts: Daniel Burdett, engineer, Manhattan; Dr. Frank Carr, orth. surg., Brooklyn; Dr. Edmond Provder, vocational rehabilitation, Manhattan.

Deft. Expert: Dr. Kenneth Seslowe, orth. surg., Elmhurst.

Disclaimer: The information on this website and blog is for general informational purposes only and is not professional advice. We make no guarantees of accuracy or completeness. We disclaim all liability for errors, omissions, or reliance on this content. Always consult a qualified professional for specific guidance.

RECENT POSTS

Vocational expert reviewing earning capacity records
November 2, 2026
Learn how vocational experts evaluate work history, medical limits, job options, and future income to measure a serious injury's financial impact.
Expert reviewing future medical needs in a catastrophic injury case
October 19, 2026
Learn how future care planning helps document medical needs, support damages, and clarify long-term care in catastrophic injury cases.
Attorney reviewing a plaintiff's future care report
October 5, 2026
Learn which reporting mistakes can weaken serious injury cases, from unsupported care needs to poor cost research, outdated records, and unclear expert opinions.
Attorney reviewing a serious injury case
September 21, 2026
Learn what attorneys should look for when choosing a future care expert, including credentials, clinical experience, report quality, and litigation readiness.
Injury case documents and medical records
September 7, 2026
Learn which actions can damage a personal injury case, from delayed treatment to poor documentation. Discover practical ways to protect evidence and support future damages.

CONTACT US