David and Monica Revill v. Boston Road Development Corp. and Bronx Pro Real Estate

David and Monica Revill v. Boston Road Development Corp. and Bronx Pro Real Estate

Case Name

David and Monica Revill v. Boston Road Development Corp. and Bronx Pro Real Estate

Type of Injury

RAISED FLOOR BOARDS FOLLOWING APARTMENT BUILDING FLOOD – PROPERTY DAMAGE

Occupation

warehouse worker

Location

Bronx, NY

Verdict

Defense verdict on liability (5/1).

Verdict Amount

$0.00

Case Details

c

XVII/35-12 FALLDOWN RAISED FLOOR BOARDS FOLLOWING APARTMENT BUILDING FLOOD PROPERTY DAMAGE DEFENSE VERDICT ON LIABILITY

David and Monica Revill v. Boston Road Development Corp. and Bronx Pro Real Estate 18458/95 9-day trial Verdict 1/14/00 Bronx Supreme

Judge: Lucindo Suarez

Verdict: Defense verdict on liability (5/1). Jury: 2 male, 4 female.

Pltf. Atty: Steven Wildstein, Great Neck

Deft. Atty: Jack G. Russo of Meyer, Suozzi, English & Klein, Manhattan

Facts: Pltf., a 37-year-old warehouse worker, claimed that in April 1995, a pipe burst in the heat riser of Defts. apartment building, causing his apartment to flood. Pltf. s apartment was located on the main floor, and his entire apartment was flooded with several inches of water. Deft. produced a videotape of the flood. He claimed $24,000 for property damage. The water was ultimately drained, and Pltf. s floor boards buckled. Several days after the accident, Pltf. tripped and fell over one of the floor boards in his bedroom. Pltf. claimed that Deft. was negligent for failing to repair the floor after the flood. Pltf. s expert testified that the floor constituted a dangerous condition. Defts. claimed that Pltf. was offered the opportunity to move out, but he did not move. They also claimed that Pltf. knew the floor was defective in the bedroom, but that he chose to go into the bedroom anyway.

Injuries: torn anterior cruciate ligament requiring two surgeries with hospitalizations. Pltf. claimed that he requires the use of a cane. Pltf. s vocational rehabilitation expert testified that Pltf. can only work at sedentary jobs that have less earning potential than his former job. Demonstrative evidence: videotape; wage projection charts. Jury deliberation: 45 minutes. Carrier: United International.

Pltf. Experts: Daniel Burdett, engineer, Manhattan; Dr. Frank Carr, orth. surg., Brooklyn; Dr. Edmond Provder, vocational rehabilitation, Manhattan.

Deft. Expert: Dr. Kenneth Seslowe, orth. surg., Elmhurst.

Disclaimer: The information on this website and blog is for general informational purposes only and is not professional advice. We make no guarantees of accuracy or completeness. We disclaim all liability for errors, omissions, or reliance on this content. Always consult a qualified professional for specific guidance.

RECENT POSTS

Attorney reviewing a serious injury case
September 21, 2026
Learn what attorneys should look for when choosing a future care expert, including credentials, clinical experience, report quality, and litigation readiness.
Injury case documents and medical records
September 7, 2026
Learn which actions can damage a personal injury case, from delayed treatment to poor documentation. Discover practical ways to protect evidence and support future damages.
Expert reviewing medical records
August 24, 2026
Learn how a medical needs assessment helps identify future care, daily living needs, and functional limits in serious injury cases. Discover what makes the process reliable.
Expert comparing future medical cost reports
August 3, 2026
Learn how a medical cost projection differs from a life care plan. See which report may better document future medical needs in a complex injury claim.
Specialist filing personal injury litigation
July 20, 2026
Learn how functional capacity evaluations document work limits and support injury claims. See how testing clarifies employability and earning capacity.

CONTACT US