David and Monica Revill v. Boston Road Development Corp. and Bronx Pro Real Estate

David and Monica Revill v. Boston Road Development Corp. and Bronx Pro Real Estate

Case Name

David and Monica Revill v. Boston Road Development Corp. and Bronx Pro Real Estate

Type of Injury

RAISED FLOOR BOARDS FOLLOWING APARTMENT BUILDING FLOOD – PROPERTY DAMAGE

Occupation

warehouse worker

Location

Bronx, NY

Verdict

Defense verdict on liability (5/1).

Verdict Amount

$0.00

Case Details

c

XVII/35-12 FALLDOWN RAISED FLOOR BOARDS FOLLOWING APARTMENT BUILDING FLOOD PROPERTY DAMAGE DEFENSE VERDICT ON LIABILITY

David and Monica Revill v. Boston Road Development Corp. and Bronx Pro Real Estate 18458/95 9-day trial Verdict 1/14/00 Bronx Supreme

Judge: Lucindo Suarez

Verdict: Defense verdict on liability (5/1). Jury: 2 male, 4 female.

Pltf. Atty: Steven Wildstein, Great Neck

Deft. Atty: Jack G. Russo of Meyer, Suozzi, English & Klein, Manhattan

Facts: Pltf., a 37-year-old warehouse worker, claimed that in April 1995, a pipe burst in the heat riser of Defts. apartment building, causing his apartment to flood. Pltf. s apartment was located on the main floor, and his entire apartment was flooded with several inches of water. Deft. produced a videotape of the flood. He claimed $24,000 for property damage. The water was ultimately drained, and Pltf. s floor boards buckled. Several days after the accident, Pltf. tripped and fell over one of the floor boards in his bedroom. Pltf. claimed that Deft. was negligent for failing to repair the floor after the flood. Pltf. s expert testified that the floor constituted a dangerous condition. Defts. claimed that Pltf. was offered the opportunity to move out, but he did not move. They also claimed that Pltf. knew the floor was defective in the bedroom, but that he chose to go into the bedroom anyway.

Injuries: torn anterior cruciate ligament requiring two surgeries with hospitalizations. Pltf. claimed that he requires the use of a cane. Pltf. s vocational rehabilitation expert testified that Pltf. can only work at sedentary jobs that have less earning potential than his former job. Demonstrative evidence: videotape; wage projection charts. Jury deliberation: 45 minutes. Carrier: United International.

Pltf. Experts: Daniel Burdett, engineer, Manhattan; Dr. Frank Carr, orth. surg., Brooklyn; Dr. Edmond Provder, vocational rehabilitation, Manhattan.

Deft. Expert: Dr. Kenneth Seslowe, orth. surg., Elmhurst.

Disclaimer: The information on this website and blog is for general informational purposes only and is not professional advice. We make no guarantees of accuracy or completeness. We disclaim all liability for errors, omissions, or reliance on this content. Always consult a qualified professional for specific guidance.

RECENT POSTS

Expert reviewing injury case records
June 22, 2026
Learn how a personal injury life care plan is developed and how expert analysis helps establish future damages that can withstand legal scrutiny and review.
Family discussing long-term life care planning
June 1, 2026
Learn how long-term care planning helps families prepare for future personal care needs. Practical steps and expert guidance for creating a life care plan.
How Care Planning Improves Legal and Medical Outcomes
May 18, 2026
Learn how care plan management and life care planning improve medical treatment, legal documentation, recovery support, and long-term patient outcomes.
OAS personal injury evaluation covering brain, spinal, and trauma injuries assessment
May 4, 2026
Learn how Occupational Assessment Services evaluates injury types in personal injury cases. Understand brain, spinal, and emotional injury impacts clearly.
Understanding Gross Negligence with OAS Injury Assessments
April 20, 2026
In this guide, we’ll break down what gross negligence means, how it differs from standard negligence, and why it matters in a personal injury case evaluation.

CONTACT US