Christopher Fields v. State of New York

Christopher Fields v. State of New York

Case Name

Christopher Fields v. State of New York

Type of Injury

FRACTURED CALCANEUS, WRIST AND BACK INJURIES

Occupation

carpenter

Location

White Plains, NY

Verdict

$576,772. Breakdown: $275,000 for past pain and suffering; $225,000 for future pain and suffering; $40,346 for past medical expenses; $5,000 for future medical expenses; $31,426 for past lost earnings; $0 for future lost earnings.

Verdict Amount

$576,772.00

Case Details

XVIII/2-36 SCAFFOLD ACCIDENT LIABILITY CONCEDED DAMAGES TRIAL FRACTURED CALCANEUS, WRIST AND BACK INJURIES

Christopher Fields v. State of New York Claim No. 97645 23-page Decision Filed 5/22/00 Court of Claims, White Plains

Judge: Andrew P. O Rourke

Decision: $576,772. Breakdown: $275,000 for past pain and suffering; $225,000 for future pain and suffering; $40,346 for past medical expenses; $5,000 for future medical expenses; $31,426 for past lost earnings; $0 for future lost earnings. Liability was conceded.

Clmt. Atty: Joel Bossom of Finkelstein, Levine, Gittelsohn & Partners, Newburgh

Deft. Atty: Liam O Brien of Mendes & Mount, L.L.P., Manhattan

Facts: On 8/28/96, Clmt., a carpenter who was 36 years old at the time of trial, was injured while employed on a construction project at Stewart International Airport. Clmt. fell approximately 8 feet from a scaffold onto a concrete surface. The State conceded liability under Labor Law ?240, and the trial proceeded damages.

Injuries: comminuted fractures to the right calcaneus; torn cartilage in the right wrist; soft tissue injuries to the back. The heel injury required three separate surgeries: open reduction and internal fixation, removal of hardware and scar tissue from the subtalar joint to restore motion, and a subtalar fusion (scheduled to be performed in October of 1998, but canceled because Clmt. suffered a subsequent hand accident). Clmt. s physician testified that Clmt. would be left with degenerative arthritis, permanent pain, and a permanent limp. Deft. s expert testified that a subtalar fusion was unnecessary, because it is required only in cases of intractable pain . Deft. conceded that Clmt. suffered atrophy of the right calf muscle, but concluded that the injuries Clmt. sustained should not have any bearing on the walking function. Clmt. contended that his injuries confined him to work as a shop carpenter and he could no longer work on construction projects because he could not climb ladders, or work at heights or on uneven surfaces. As a result, he claimed that his earning ability was reduced to less than $10 per hour, approximately one-third less than the hourly rate for a general carpenter. The court found, however, that proof indicated that Clmt. returned to work after his injury on restricted duty, and received the same rate of pay he had received prior to the injury. The court found that Clmt. would require a subtalar fusion in the future, but found speculative the contention that the possibility of a fourth surgery, a triple arthrodesis, would be required.

Clmt. Experts: Dr. Joel Mandel, orth surg., New Windsor; Dr. David L. Helfet, treating orth. surg., Manhattan.

Deft. Experts: Dr. Leon Sultan, orth. surg., Franklin Square; Edmond Provder, vocational rehabilitation, Manhattan.

Disclaimer: The information on this website and blog is for general informational purposes only and is not professional advice. We make no guarantees of accuracy or completeness. We disclaim all liability for errors, omissions, or reliance on this content. Always consult a qualified professional for specific guidance.

RECENT POSTS

Deposition Insights: How OAS Helps Personal Injury Attorneys
March 2, 2026
Discover how OAS vocational evaluations and expert deposition support help personal injury attorneys strengthen cases and maximize settlement outcomes.
OAS Supports Injury Evaluations in Florida Car Accidents
February 16, 2026
OAS helps Florida car accident attorneys with injury evaluations, vocational assessments, and life care plans to ensure fair compensation for clients.
Maximizing Your Personal Injury Claim with OAS Experts
February 2, 2026
Learn how OAS expert services like vocational evaluations, life care plans, and demonstrative evidence help attorneys document damages in personal injury cases.
Why Demonstrative Evidence is Crucial in Catastrophic Injury Cases
January 19, 2026
Learn why demonstrative evidence is vital in catastrophic injury cases, helping juries understand complex facts, damages, and impact through clear visuals aids
What You Need to Know About Documenting Damages in Personal Injury Cases
January 5, 2026
This guide explains everything you need to know in clear and simple terms, including why documentation matters, what to collect, and how it helps with legal support.

CONTACT US