Christopher C. Harvey v. New Jersey Department of Transportation

Christopher C. Harvey v. New Jersey Department of Transportation

Case Name

Christopher C. Harvey v. New Jersey Department of Transportation

Type of Injury

LEG AMPUTATION

Occupation

Road Worker

Location

Middlesex County, New Jersey

Verdict

The parties agreed to a $2,650,000 settlement on the eve of trial, in mediation with Judge Jessica Mayer.

Verdict Amount

$2,650,000

Case Details

On May 20, 2011, plaintiff Christopher Harvey, 41, a road worker, was replacing pavement markers on Route 27 in Edison. While he was doing so, a safety truck, which was parked uphill and had been accidentally left by a co-worker in neutral gear, rolled downhill. It struck Harvey and pinned him to another truck. The impact crushed Harvey’s left leg and right foot.

Harvey was an employee of Traffic Lines Inc., a contractor for the New Jersey Department of Transportation.

He sued the Department of Transportation, alleging negligence in failing to properly supervise the project site.

He maintained that the two vehicles had been placed too close together on the site. He also argued that under state and federal law, the Department of Transportation had a duty to monitor safety on the site and that the accident would not have occurred if not for this breach in duty.

The defense counsel argued that the accident was the result of Harvey’s co-worker’s negligence, for which the department was not responsible.

Harvey’s engineering expert provided a report which argued that the department had notice of ongoing project dysfunction. He opined that the department did not understand or execute its supervision responsibilities.

The defense’s expert engineer disputed the report, arguing that the department was responsible only for general oversight.

Counsel for Harvey obtained acknowledgement that a worker’s compensation lien did not attach because the Department of Transportation is a public entity.

Disclaimer: The information on this website and blog is for general informational purposes only and is not professional advice. We make no guarantees of accuracy or completeness. We disclaim all liability for errors, omissions, or reliance on this content. Always consult a qualified professional for specific guidance.

RECENT POSTS

Expert comparing future medical cost reports
August 3, 2026
Learn how a medical cost projection differs from a life care plan. See which report may better document future medical needs in a complex injury claim.
Specialist filing personal injury litigation
July 20, 2026
Learn how functional capacity evaluations document work limits and support injury claims. See how testing clarifies employability and earning capacity.
Long-term care assessment documents
July 6, 2026
Discover how future care planning helps document medical needs, support damage assessments, and strengthen personal injury claims with evidence-based evaluations.
Expert reviewing injury case records
June 22, 2026
Learn how a personal injury life care plan is developed and how expert analysis helps establish future damages that can withstand legal scrutiny and review.
Family discussing long-term life care planning
June 1, 2026
Learn how long-term care planning helps families prepare for future personal care needs. Practical steps and expert guidance for creating a life care plan.

CONTACT US