Cheryl Reid, indiv. and as m/n/g of Robert Reid II v. County of Nassau and Dr. Catherine Goring

Cheryl Reid, indiv. and as m/n/g of Robert Reid II v. County of Nassau and Dr. Catherine Goring

Case Name

Cheryl Reid, indiv. and as m/n/g of Robert Reid II v. County of Nassau and Dr. Catherine Goring

Type of Injury

CHILDBIRTH – SHOULDER DYSTOCIA CAUSES ERB’S PALSY AND BRACHIAL PLEXUS INJURY

Location

Nassau, NY

Verdict

$3,020,000 (6/0).

Verdict Amount

$3,020,000.00

Case Details

X/12-1 MEDICAL MALPRACTICE CHILDBIRTH SHOULDER DYSTOCIA CAUSES ERB’S PALSY AND BRACHIAL PLEXUS INJURY

Cheryl Reid, indiv. and as m/n/g of Robert Reid II v. County of Nassau and Dr. Catherine Goring 984/91 10-day trial Verdict 9/8/92 Judge James Brucia, Nassau Supreme

VERDICT: $3,020,000 (6/0). Breakdown: $20,000 for past pain and suffering; $2,000,000 for future pain and suffering; $1,000,000 for diminution of future earnings. Post-trial motions were denied. Jury: 2 male, 4 female.

Pltf. Atty: Stanley A. Landers, Kew Gardens

Deft. Atty: Clifford A. Bartlett of Bartlett, McDonough & Monahan, Garden City

Facts: On 9/19/90, Pltf., age 37, went into labor with her fourth child at Nassau County Medical Center. The infant’s head crowned, but his right shoulder became caught on Pltf.’s pelvic bone. Deft. Dr. Goring, a fourth-year resident who was handling the delivery, applied lateral traction to release the shoulder. Pltf. contended that Deft. used excessive force, resulting in a brachial plexus injury and Erb’s palsy.

Pltf. contended that Defts. should have known that she was predisposed to shoulder dystocia, given her history of high birth weight babies. Her third child weighed 9 lbs. at birth, and Pltf. claimed that Defts. knew that this child would weigh more than 9 lbs. Pltf.’s expert contended that the probability of shoulder dystocia increases after repeated deliveries of large babies.

Pltf.’s obstetrical expert contended that the delivery was mismanaged . He testified that after the infant’s head appeared and Pltf. was fully dilated, pressure should have been applied to her abdomen. He contended that the child’s head should not have been touched. Pltf.’s examining pediatric neurologist testified that the infant’s injuries resulted from excessive lateral force to his head.

Pltf.’s vocational rehabilitation expert testified that the child would have a diminution of earnings of approximately $3,000 per year for life. Pltf.’s economist testified that the child’s loss of earnings over the course of his working life was approximately $1,700,000.

Deft.’s obstetrician testified that Erb’s palsy can occur without malpractice, and that such an injury does not immediately indicate negligence. He contended that Defts.’ care was proper. Deft.’s pediatric neurologist conceded that the injury was permanent. Offer: $200,000; demand: $1,100,000; amount asked of jury: $5,700,000. Jury deliberation: 4 hours. Pltf. Experts: Dr. George Farmakides, ob-gyn, Mineola; Dr. Barbara Stewart, examining pediatric neurologist, Forest Hills; Edmond Provder, vocational rehabilitation expert; Dr. Seymour Barcun, Ph.D., economist, Edison, New Jersey. Deft. Experts: Dr. Richard Hausknecht, ob- gyn, Manhattan; Dr. Robert Gould, pediatric neurologist, Great Neck.

Disclaimer: The information on this website and blog is for general informational purposes only and is not professional advice. We make no guarantees of accuracy or completeness. We disclaim all liability for errors, omissions, or reliance on this content. Always consult a qualified professional for specific guidance.

RECENT POSTS

Family discussing long-term life care planning
June 1, 2026
Learn how long-term care planning helps families prepare for future personal care needs. Practical steps and expert guidance for creating a life care plan.
How Care Planning Improves Legal and Medical Outcomes
May 18, 2026
Learn how care plan management and life care planning improve medical treatment, legal documentation, recovery support, and long-term patient outcomes.
OAS personal injury evaluation covering brain, spinal, and trauma injuries assessment
May 4, 2026
Learn how Occupational Assessment Services evaluates injury types in personal injury cases. Understand brain, spinal, and emotional injury impacts clearly.
Understanding Gross Negligence with OAS Injury Assessments
April 20, 2026
In this guide, we’ll break down what gross negligence means, how it differs from standard negligence, and why it matters in a personal injury case evaluation.
Personal injury lawsuit process overview with OAS expert support
April 6, 2026
Learn the full personal injury lawsuit process and how OAS expert services strengthen cases, improve evidence, and help maximize compensation outcomes.

CONTACT US