Cheryl Reid, indiv. and as m/n/g of Robert Reid II v. County of Nassau and Dr. Catherine Goring

Cheryl Reid, indiv. and as m/n/g of Robert Reid II v. County of Nassau and Dr. Catherine Goring

Case Name

Cheryl Reid, indiv. and as m/n/g of Robert Reid II v. County of Nassau and Dr. Catherine Goring

Type of Injury

CHILDBIRTH – SHOULDER DYSTOCIA CAUSES ERB’S PALSY AND BRACHIAL PLEXUS INJURY

Location

Nassau, NY

Verdict

$3,020,000 (6/0).

Verdict Amount

$3,020,000.00

Case Details

X/12-1 MEDICAL MALPRACTICE CHILDBIRTH SHOULDER DYSTOCIA CAUSES ERB’S PALSY AND BRACHIAL PLEXUS INJURY

Cheryl Reid, indiv. and as m/n/g of Robert Reid II v. County of Nassau and Dr. Catherine Goring 984/91 10-day trial Verdict 9/8/92 Judge James Brucia, Nassau Supreme

VERDICT: $3,020,000 (6/0). Breakdown: $20,000 for past pain and suffering; $2,000,000 for future pain and suffering; $1,000,000 for diminution of future earnings. Post-trial motions were denied. Jury: 2 male, 4 female.

Pltf. Atty: Stanley A. Landers, Kew Gardens

Deft. Atty: Clifford A. Bartlett of Bartlett, McDonough & Monahan, Garden City

Facts: On 9/19/90, Pltf., age 37, went into labor with her fourth child at Nassau County Medical Center. The infant’s head crowned, but his right shoulder became caught on Pltf.’s pelvic bone. Deft. Dr. Goring, a fourth-year resident who was handling the delivery, applied lateral traction to release the shoulder. Pltf. contended that Deft. used excessive force, resulting in a brachial plexus injury and Erb’s palsy.

Pltf. contended that Defts. should have known that she was predisposed to shoulder dystocia, given her history of high birth weight babies. Her third child weighed 9 lbs. at birth, and Pltf. claimed that Defts. knew that this child would weigh more than 9 lbs. Pltf.’s expert contended that the probability of shoulder dystocia increases after repeated deliveries of large babies.

Pltf.’s obstetrical expert contended that the delivery was mismanaged . He testified that after the infant’s head appeared and Pltf. was fully dilated, pressure should have been applied to her abdomen. He contended that the child’s head should not have been touched. Pltf.’s examining pediatric neurologist testified that the infant’s injuries resulted from excessive lateral force to his head.

Pltf.’s vocational rehabilitation expert testified that the child would have a diminution of earnings of approximately $3,000 per year for life. Pltf.’s economist testified that the child’s loss of earnings over the course of his working life was approximately $1,700,000.

Deft.’s obstetrician testified that Erb’s palsy can occur without malpractice, and that such an injury does not immediately indicate negligence. He contended that Defts.’ care was proper. Deft.’s pediatric neurologist conceded that the injury was permanent. Offer: $200,000; demand: $1,100,000; amount asked of jury: $5,700,000. Jury deliberation: 4 hours. Pltf. Experts: Dr. George Farmakides, ob-gyn, Mineola; Dr. Barbara Stewart, examining pediatric neurologist, Forest Hills; Edmond Provder, vocational rehabilitation expert; Dr. Seymour Barcun, Ph.D., economist, Edison, New Jersey. Deft. Experts: Dr. Richard Hausknecht, ob- gyn, Manhattan; Dr. Robert Gould, pediatric neurologist, Great Neck.

Disclaimer: The information on this website and blog is for general informational purposes only and is not professional advice. We make no guarantees of accuracy or completeness. We disclaim all liability for errors, omissions, or reliance on this content. Always consult a qualified professional for specific guidance.

RECENT POSTS

Vocational Evaluation in Personal Injury Cases
October 20, 2025
Learn how vocational evaluation documents work capacity, future earning losses, and job limits to support personal injury claims. See OAS Inc’s approach.
The Role of a Vocational Expert in Determining Spousal Support
October 6, 2025
In this article, we’ll explain what a vocational expert does, why their role is important in vocational evaluation for divorce & matrimonial cases. Call us now
Life Care Planning Due To Medical Malpractice
September 22, 2025
Discover how life care planning works, why it matters in medical malpractice cases, and how it benefits both patients and the legal system. Contact OAS Today!
Demonstrative Evidence in Vocational Assessments
September 1, 2025
In this article, we’ll explore what demonstrative evidence is, why it matters in vocational assessments, and how it can make complex information easier.
Wrongful Death Case
August 18, 2025
Learn how a vocational evaluation for wrongful death cases can help calculate financial loss, strengthen your claim, and secure fair compensation. Call us Today

CONTACT US