Annie Ferguson v. City of New York

Annie Ferguson v. City of New York

Case Name

Annie Ferguson v. City of New York

Type of Injury

KNEE INJURIES

Occupation

unemployed

Location

Bronx, NY

Verdict

$2,134,890 reduced to $1,067,445 for 50% comparative negligence of Pltf. (6/0).

Verdict Amount

$1,067,445.00

Case Details

X/8-5 FALLDOWN CITY LIABLE FOR ICY SIDEWALK $2 MILLION GROSS AWARD FOR PAIN AND SUFFERING KNEE INJURIES

Annie Ferguson v. City of New York 7745/89 2-week trial Verdict 5/20/92 Judge Hansel L. McGee, Bronx Supreme

VERDICT: $2,134,890 reduced to $1,067,445 for 50% comparative negligence of Pltf. (6/0). Breakdown: $2,000,000 for pain and suffering; $ 134,890 for medical expenses. Post-trial motions were denied. Jury: 1 male, 5 female.

Pltf. Atty: William A. Gallina of Klar, Piergrossi & Gallina, Bronx

Deft. Atty: Eugene P. Grimes, Asst. Corp. Counsel

Facts: Pltf., age 46 and unemployed at the time of the accident on 2/8/85, contended that she slipped and fell on an accumulation of ice on the sidewalk in front of 879 E. 165th St. in the Bronx. The ice was the result of two snowfalls during the week of 2/1 – 2/7/85. Pltf. testified that the snow had not been cleared at all in that time and had been walked on to the point where it became icy and uneven. Deft. contended that it had no duty to Pltf. as a matter of law. Deft. also argued that the accident did not happen where Pltf. claimed it did, citing several different addresses given to the police and ambulance operators. Deft. theorized that Pltf. slipped and fell in her apartment. The jury found 50% comparative negligence against Pltf. for her failure to proceed with adequate caution while traversing the ice. Injuries: tear of the anterior and posterior cruciate ligament; osteochondral fracture of the medial femoral condyle; torn lateral meniscus; iliotibial band tear; torn popliteal tendon; hematoma of the peroneal nerve; aggravation of preexisting carpel tunnel syndrome to both hands requiring surgical release. Pltf. underwent reconstructive surgery to the knee and arthrodesis with the application of an external fixator and a brace. Pltf. has undergone 2 years of physical therapy. She currently has a fused left knee and a partial left foot drop. Demonstrative evidence: photograph of street; enlargements of weather reports; illustrations of the operative procedures; X-rays; models of the knee. Offer: $150,000; demand: $750,000; amount asked of jury: $5,000,000. Jury deliberation: 2? hours. Pltf. Experts: Dr. I. Martin Levy, orth. surg., Bronx; Edmond Provder, rehabilitation expert, Manhattan; John R. Martin, meteorologist. There was no expert testimony for Deft.

Disclaimer: The information on this website and blog is for general informational purposes only and is not professional advice. We make no guarantees of accuracy or completeness. We disclaim all liability for errors, omissions, or reliance on this content. Always consult a qualified professional for specific guidance.

RECENT POSTS

Life Care Planning Expert Witness's Role in Personal Injury Cases
December 1, 2025
This article explains what a life care planner does, how they serve as expert witnesses, and why their role is crucial in personal injury cases in the United States.
Why Earning Capacity Assessments Are Key for Fair Injury Claims
November 17, 2025
Learn why earning capacity assessments are vital for fair personal injury claims, how these vocational assessments are done, across the United States with OAS.
How Vocational Evaluations Affect Divorce and Spousal Support
November 3, 2025
Explore how vocational evaluations influence divorce, alimony, and spousal support. See how OAS experts deliver fair, court-ready assessments nationwide.
Vocational Evaluation in Personal Injury Cases
October 20, 2025
Learn how vocational evaluation documents work capacity, future earning losses, and job limits to support personal injury claims. See OAS Inc’s approach.
The Role of a Vocational Expert in Determining Spousal Support
October 6, 2025
In this article, we’ll explain what a vocational expert does, why their role is important in vocational evaluation for divorce & matrimonial cases. Call us now

CONTACT US